Yahoo News on the Fukushima Nuclear Plant

Saturday 30 April 2011

Chernobyl exclusion zones showing "hot spots" of nuclear contamination

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chernobyl_radiation_map_1996.svg


The deposition of radionuclides is almost always uneven as this image shows. Eventually we'll have a similar map for Japan but fortunately for the Japanese most of the radioactive material was carried by the wind over the Pacific Ocean toward North America. The takehome lesson here is if you find yourself near a nuclear disaster, make sure you're not downwind of it.

Wednesday 20 April 2011

America's Aging Nuke Plants

From http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/11/20/20greenwire-as-nuclear-reactor-fleet-ages-engineers-ask-is-94897.html

The oldest commercial plants in the United States reached their 40th anniversary this year, and the average plant has operated for 30 years. Already, more than half of the nation's more than 100 reactors have seen their initial licenses extended for an additional two decades. Nearly all the country's plants are expected to eventually win such extensions.

Designed for 40 years, plant operators are saying they can treat nuke plants like used cars and replace parts to keep them running, maybe as long as 100 years!  Now THAT inspires confidence in the nuclear industry, does it not? 

NOT

Sunday 17 April 2011

Percentage of World's Reactors In Operation

From http://www.mcnucprojects.com/FAQs.htm

The United States is clearly the biggest offender, the head of the nuclear beast.  Makes sense because that's where the technology was largely invented and then promoted as a panacea ("e.g. too cheap to meter"), coupled with psychopathic capitalism seeking easy billions it's easy to see why the pie chart reflects it: 

Saturday 16 April 2011

The nuclear industry is proving itself contaminated with incompetence and stupidity

There's been some interesting discussion at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Nuclear-Power/46528750288 between Dr. Simanonok and a fellow calling himself Justin Forro, who claims to be a graduate student in Nuclear Engineering and says he got his initial nuclear training in the Navy in an "accelerated program".  Justin believes quite strongly in the safety of nuclear power despite the abundant and obvious evidence ruling against it, but the scary part is that he is being taught gross absurdities by whoever's been instructing him, and the last thing we need in the nuclear industry is EVEN MORE stupidity and ignorance bringing disasters like Fukushima down upon us.  Justin clearly shows that many of the educators for the nuclear power industry are grossly incompetent through their failure to understand & teach the real hazards of radioactivity and their apparent desire to NOT want to understand & teach them either!  OF COURSE nuclear power makes sense to them in the fantasy world they fabricate by ignoring and dismissing the real dangers!  This is what we're up against folks: incompetence and stupidity believing they know it all.  Observe Justin's easy dismissal of reality, his arrogance and desire for his opinions to be forced upon others, his childish habit of personal attacks (not shown: he's advocated the murder of Dr. Helen Caldicott), and ask yourself: is this the kind of person you want running nuclear reactors?  Because he is what we have going for us. Not a very good prospect, I know:


Please note the blue-highlighted text above; Justin makes several other errors too but what's highlighted is just SO wrong and SO ignorant that I corrected him thusly:

@"Know-it-all Justin" Let's start with your own faulty analysis: "With a half-life of 24,000 years the probability of any particulate plutonium alpha decaying inside the lungs is near impossible. Even still, you would have to near (sic) an extremely large quantity of particulate plutonium in order for it to even be probable." Let's say we're talking about a smoke or ash particle of pure Pu-239 too small to readily see with the naked eye weighing only one microgram. Of course in the real world we know the stuff blasted out of the Chernobyl and Fukushima reactors wasn't pure and each tiny particle didn't necessarily weigh exactly one microgram, but we'll take this simple example to its logical conclusion..  Pu-239 has a specific activity of .063 Curies per gram where a Curie is a unit of radioactivity equalling 3.7 * 10e10 disintegrations per second so one microgram of plutonium-239 will be decaying at the rate of 2300+ disintegrations per second! 

@"Know-it-all Justin" so much for your "probability of any particulate plutonium alpha decaying inside the lungs is near impossible" even for much smaller quantities of plutonium-239 than the one microgram used for this example, and if you really understood even the basics of radioactivity you wouldn't make such asinine and misleading statements, would you?  So my only question is, are you just an ordinary run of the mill dumbass shooting off your ignorant mouth Justin, or are you deliberately shilling for the nuclear industry, spreading disinformation knowingly?

@"Know-it-all Justin" of course there's plenty of room to quibble: we don't know yet how many Curies of plutonium-239 have been released at Fukushima SO FAR, we don't know the size distribution of particles released SO FAR in the explosions and fires, we can't know how much of it has blown over to the U.S., we don't know how pure those particles are or how many people have inhaled any of them and we don't know how many of those extremely dangerous particles will find their way into human bodies in the future through resuspension in air and water or through food contamination.  So we are not really talking ONLY about Pu-239, and ONLY about alpha emitters, but whatever unknown toxic mix of radionuclides has come from Fukushima so far and hasn't yet decayed.  Despite these MAJOR UNKNOWNS however we can still expect apologists for the nuclear industry to issue calm assurances that everything is fine, no danger, nothing to see here move along now please. Only a fool would believe them.

@"Know-it-all Justin" what we do know without any question is that a microgram is in the ballpark of reasonable weights for a dust particle, and that almost every person who is unfortunate enough to inhale or ingest a plutonium-laden dust particle from Fukushima (or even Chernobyl dust for that matter, there's lots of it) is very likely to get cancer from it and die unless they die of something else first. That's an ALMOST GUARANTEED CANCER SITUATION Justin, meaning you only need to inhale ONE TINY LITTLE DUST PARTICLE of plutonium and it's essentially a death sentence.  THAT is the truth of nuclear power Justin, that the guy in the white shirt and tie at your nuclear orientation class didn't tell you. Or that you don't want people to know.  Which is it?


Radiation risks from Fukushima 'no longer negligible'

Published: 11 April 2011 | Updated: 12 April 2011

The risks associated with iodine-131 contamination in Europe are no longer "negligible," according to CRIIRAD, a French research body on radioactivity. The NGO is advising pregnant women and infants against "risky behaviour," such as consuming fresh milk or vegetables with large leaves.

The document, published on 7 April, advises against consuming rainwater and says vulnerable groups such as children and pregnant or breastfeeding women should avoid consuming vegetables with large leaves, fresh milk and creamy cheese.

The risks related to prolonged contamination among vulnerable groups of the population can no longer be considered "negligible" and it is now necessary to avoid "risky behaviour," CRIIRAD claimed. 
However, the institute underlines that there is absolutely no need to lock oneself indoors or take iodine tablets.

From http://www.euractiv.com/en/health/radiation-risks-fukushima-longer-negligible-news-503947

If you read French the full report in its original form is here

Japanese Risk Radiation to Save Stranded Dogs

TOKYO -- When Etsumi Ogino saw a news photo of a pack of shelties wandering through an abandoned town near Japan's tsunami-damaged nuclear plant, she thought of her own 13-year-old canine Kein and jumped into action.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/14/japanese-save-stranded-dogs_n_849081.html

A Meltdown Is Forever

Sunday 10 April 2011

Radiation Explained by Lena Groeger

From Lena's blog at http://lenagroeger.blogspot.com/
(double-click on image to enlarge)

Radioactivity Reports

The Japanese power company TEPCO which runs the Fukushima plants releases frequent status updates of radiation detected, which is apparently read at their property gates.  At least they're giving out real numbers but where are the readings for water draining the site and going into the ocean, where are the measurements taken inside the plants?

http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/monitoring/

Tuesday 5 April 2011

Censorship at the Huffington Post -- Part of the Problem Rather Than Any Solution

The following comment has previously been CENSORED by somebody with an axe to grind at the Huffington Post, but they don't tell you what they find objectionable they just act like Nazis ever since being sold to AOL and they censor whatever they feel like.  So not knowing WHY there is only left guessing, and I'm guessing it's either they don't tolerate criticism aimed at them or they didn't like the link I posted along with (though it's been fine in other posts) so I have taken those out and just posted the comment below.  Let's see how badly HuffPo is part of the information bottleneck regarding the Fukushima meltdowns, will they even tolerate this mild post?

The original article titled "Homeopathy For Radiation Poisoning" is at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dana-ullman/homeopathy-for-radiation-poisioning_b_842664.html

This article is misleading and potentiall­­y dangerous to anyone unwise enough to take it seriously. The author seems to imply that small doses of radiation might actually be good for you, an old concept called "hormesis" which was never scientific­­ally validated and does not make sense because ionizing radiation only induces damage to biomolecul­­es and cells, never any kind of healing or cleansing or anything good. It's a little like saying small doses of arsenic or lead might be good for you, which the author actually attempts to support above in the case of arsenic! Some of his proposed homeopathi­­c remedies even contain radioactiv­­e elements like radium and uranium! This reflects an astounding disconnect with the medical knowledge gained since the pioneering days of radiation when people used to think it was good for them and exposed themselves to harmful radiation as a tonic. We know better nowadays.

Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Extreme views?

I'm not sure how accurate the reporting is out of Great Britain even on a good day but this article suggests some very "grim" outcomes at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1371793/Japan-nuclear-crisis-Fukushima-plant-entombed-concrete-radiation-leak.html

The 100-year battle to make Fukushima safe: Grim prediction as brave workers expect to 'die within weeks'

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 11:57 AM on 2nd April 2011
  • Workers warned they're facing a 100-year battle to make fuel rods safe
  • Those battling to stop nuclear meltdown are expected to die in weeks
  • American recruiter asked to hire technicians to help
  • World's largest concrete pump is being flown from U.S. to assist
  • Evacuation zone refugees won't be able to go home for months, admits Japanese minister
  • Joint Japanese-U.S. mission recovers bodies from sea
  • Man arrested after crashing car through gate of stricken N-plant
  • TEPCO releases video showing damage inside Fukushima's Unit 4

Monday 4 April 2011

Radiation Dosage Charts

Sometimes it can be difficult to understand the wide scale of radiation exposures that are possible, from miniscule (i.e. eating a banana) to huge (i.e. exposure to reactor cores) especially when the terminology sometimes jumps from rads and rems to grays and sieverts. These excellent images are from
http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/radiation-dosage-chart/ and http://xkcd.com/radiation/

Please double-click on the images to view them full size:


Japan Earthquake 2011: 'Fukushima 50' Details Emerge In Email Correspondence


"radiation within 12 miles of the leaking nuclear plant has prevented the recovery of about 1,000 victims" = the contaminat­ion is INTENSE in certain areas.



I wrote the book Antinuclea­r Nutrition about radiation protection especially from internally deposited radionuclu­des, and I sure hope whoever manages the radiologic­al education for the Fukushima 50 (even if they are 300+) knows all it contains (http://ant­inuclearnu­trition.co­m). We should all be thankful the disaster hasn't been worse and we should be especially thankful that of all the hundreds of aging nuclear power reactors there are around the world that more of them haven't blown up by now.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Censorship #2 at the Huffington Post

An article titled "Homeopathy For Radiation Poisoning" at the Huffington Post is SO bad and received SO much criticism (see http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dana-ullman/homeopathy-for-radiation-poisioning_b_842664.html ) that the comments below it are apparently being watched over very closely by someone with an axe to grind.  The following comment was CENSORED TWICE SO FAR!  Although there are many other comments there with a similar tone, perhaps this one was censored because it takes HuffPo to task for letting such a poor article slip through to publication:

This article is misleading and potentiall­y dangerous to anyone unwise enough to take it seriously. The author seems to imply that small doses of radiation might actually be good for you, an old concept called "hormesis" which was never scientific­ally validated and does not make sense because ionizing radiation only induces damage to biomolecul­es and cells, never any kind of healing or cleansing or anything good. It's a little like saying small doses of arsenic or lead might be good for you, which the author actually attempts to support above in the case of arsenic! Some of his proposed homeopathi­c remedies even contain radioactiv­e elements like radium and uranium! This reflects an astounding disconnect with the medical knowledge gained since the pioneering days of radiation when people used to think it was good for them and exposed themselves to harmful radiation as a tonic. We know better nowadays.

I am all for any homeopathy that works but its treatment in this article doesn't pass the simplest sniff test and should never have been approved for HuffPo. Anyone serious about protecting themselves from radiation should avail themselves of the best that modern science can offer, and avoid quackery like this from the 1800's. My book Antinuclea­r Nutrition, available at http://Ant­inuclearNu­trition.co­m , reflects the state of the art in the SCIENCE of radiation protection­. If you have any friends who live in Japan, please let them know about it because it could really help them.

Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Sunday 3 April 2011

Atomic Forensics

Because the Japanese government has been withholding information about the severity of reactor damage, some of the best estimates of reactor damage at Fukushima have come through mathematical modeling based on what has been made public and what radionuclide releases have been measured, in a process called atomic forensics.

Censorship at the Huffington Post

 This comment was CENSORED on 4.3.11 at the Huffington Post below a truly terrible article titled "Homeopathy For Radiation Poisoning" at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dana-ullman/homeopathy-for-radiation-poisioning_b_842664.htm

This article is misleading and potentiall­y dangerous javascript:void(0)to anyone unwise enough to take it seriously. The author seems to imply that small doses of radiation might actually be good for you, an old concept called "hormesis" which was never scientific­ally validated and does not make sense because ionizing radiation only induces damage to biomolecul­es and cells, never any kind of healing or cleansing or anything good. It's a little like saying small doses of arsenic or lead might be good for you, which the author actually attempts to support above in the case of arsenic! Some of his proposed homeopathi­c remedies even contain radioactiv­e elements like radium and uranium! This reflects an astounding disconnect with the medical knowledge gained since the pioneering days of radiation when people used to think it was good for them and exposed themselves to harmful radiation as a tonic. We know better nowadays.

I am all for homeopathy that works but its treatment in this article doesn't pass the simplest sniff test and should never have been approved for HuffPo. Anyone serious about protecting themselves from radiation should avail themselves of the best that modern science can offer, and avoid quackery like this from the 1800's. My book Antinuclea­r Nutrition, available at http://Ant­inuclearNu­trition.co­m , reflects the state of the art in the SCIENCE of radiation protection­. If you have any friends who live in Japan, please let them know about it because it could really help them.

Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Three Weeks After Japan's Disaster, What Are the Real Risks in the U.S.?


This is an excellent article and there should be much more good solid informatio­n like this available to people, especially those now dealing with the radiation in Japan, which will be a problem for a very long time.



A fuller treatment on the subject of radiation protection after nuclear disasters with much more background informatio­n and practical measures is available in my printable ebook Antinuclea­r Nutrition at http://Ant­inuclearNu­trition.co­m. If you have any friends in Japan please let them know of it because it could really help them!
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

The Reactors at Fukushima

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_I_Nuclear_Power_Plant (Dai-ichi = "Number 1") 6 reactors

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_II_Nuclear_Power_Plant (Dai-ni = "Number 2) 4 reactors, less affected by the events of 3.11.2011

Click on the image below from http://www.treehugger.com/files/2011/03/update-japan-nuclear-meltdown-fukushima-1-tsunami-earthquake-nukes.php to expand it and view the Fukushima 1 status on 3.16.11, indicating there was a lot more core damage than they were admitting to the public at the time:

It's Official: Tokyo Electric Power Company Downplayed Dangers

From http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/31/japan-radiation-widen-evacuation-zone_n_842905.html

TEPCO could face compensation claims of up to 11 trillion yen ($133 billion) -- nearly four times its equity -- if Japan's worst nuclear crisis drags on for two years, an analyst at Bank of America Merrill Lynch wrote in a report.

A Reuters investigation showed Japan and TEPCO repeatedly played down dangers at its nuclear plants and ignored warnings, including a 2007 tsunami study from the utility's senior safety engineer.

Saturday 2 April 2011

It's only going to get worse; Huffington Post 4.2.2011

Well DUH they've been pouring water onto open partially melted reactor cores with pumps and firehoses and helicopters for weeks now and we should be surprised that large quantities of radiation have run off into the adjacent ocean?  Next we can expect biological processes to begin concentrating certain radioactive elements in different ways.  Stock up on seaweed while it's still in the stores from pre-Fukushima supplies.